Summit of the Americas: a chance for dialogue?

The Fifth Summit of the Americas just started in Trinidad and Tobago with 34 leaders of the region attending. While most people’s attention is on US President Obama meeting the leaders of the region, there is actually the need to forward the agenda and make the conference theme Securing Our Citizens’ Future by Promoting Human Prosperity, Energy Security and Environmental Sustainability not being an empty promise. This is especially true, when looking at fundamental issues needed for the implementation of these promising goals, such as transparency, accountability and effective measures against corruption.

So far, the draft Declaration of Port-of-Spain does not go beyond any former promises. But Obama’s role can be key, showing leadership and a new consciousness for the need of cooperation on the key challenges facing the region, among them: Corruption.  Will leaders finally live up to their promises made in previous years?

americas_summitBut first have a look at the starting day of the Summit, where the Ministers of Foreign Relations engage in a dialogue with civil society. The meeting is led by the minister of the host country and the Secretary General of the OAS José Miguel Insulza. It allowed civil society groups to share with the OAS member state governments in a direct and open dialogue the main challenges, conclusions and proposals, drawn during several deliberations that took place before the Summit. Transparency International had a chance to present today, together with other four civil society regional networks, some of the citizens main worries related to corruption and transparency.

Ximena Salazar, senior advisor for the Americas region and liaison officer with the OAS, expressed that limited advances have been made in the implementation of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption (IACAC), a convention that was born as part of the Summit process more than 10 years ago.

In a report presented at the meeting, conducted by Transparency International, thanks to the support of the World Justice Initiative of the American Bar Association, highlighted three major gaps (Spanish). The report evaluated nine countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Canada, El Salvador, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Trinidad and Tobago) whether promises to fight corruption have been, thanks to the support of the World Justice Initiative of the American Bar Association, effectively translated into action. The study shows that whistleblower protection, co-operation between states (asset recovery, for example) and participation of civil society are the weakest points.

Challenges mentioned by other civil society organisations included among others democracy, crime, trade, discrimination, and the problems coming with living in the most insecure region in the world.

In their comments and responses several ministers acknowledge the relevance of the corruption issue. In particular, the ministers of Uruguay, Paraguay, Jamaica and Belize, highlighted the priority transparency has gained in the hemisphere. Colombia also emphasised the importance and need for an adequate follow-up of the commitments made in the Summits.

Only more promises? Or will anti-corruption and transparency finally make it into actual policy?

Read more at Transparency International’s In Focus section (Spanish) and the press release.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email
Georg Neumann

About Georg Neumann

Georg Neumann is Internal Communications Coordinator at Transparency International.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to Summit of the Americas: a chance for dialogue?

  1. charles reesink 30 August 2011 at 7:46 pm #

    very encouraging initiatives; here in Canada, where virtue is wrapped around the flag and we are just beginning to figure out how much we have spent on ourventure in afghanistan (…) as if we had anything to teach but how to move dirt faster, dirt sands, oil sands.
    but on the issue of corruption, entrenched bureaucracy is in itself rampant pervasive and vicious perversion of the public good.

    any initiatives focussing on bureaucracy as entrenched corruption?

    charles reesink