Post-conflict aid spending in Georgia must be transparent

Caitlin Ryan, from Transparency International’s Georgia chapter, writes about the way post-conflict aid is being handled.

After the August 2008 war with Russia, the international community pledged USD 4.5 billion for post-war recovery in Georgia. Citizens want to know how the money is being spent. Reports paint a mixed picture of aid to Georgia.

It has taken a long time, but in April Georgia became the 135th country to officially adhere to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.

Now that the government is signed up, we wanted to understand what this means in practical terms. Will it affect the architecture of aid to Georgia and, if so, how?

The Georgian government built 13 new settlements (almost 4,000 homes), financed through World Bank loans and European Commission grants.

We find that, while the answer is unclear, the move towards a standard set of principles is a positive step that can enable meaningful change.

Foreign aid plays a prominent role in Georgia’s annual budget. More than US $1.5 billion (approximately GEL 2.1 billion) were delivered annually by donors between 2009-11. The state’s annual budget in each of those years was 6.75, 6.97 and 7.35 billion GEL, respectively. While it is complicated to estimate the share of aid in the country’s overall budget, it is safe to say that international donors play an important role in Georgia’s annual expenditures.

The settlements cost approximately USD 95.4 million, while the rest of the roughly $242 mln funding are for people displaced from their homes is being spent on people displaced by wars in the early 1990s.

 

Read the rest of the article on Transparency International Georgia’s blog.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email

, , ,

4 Responses to Post-conflict aid spending in Georgia must be transparent

  1. Rex Puhr 20 January 2014 at 5:59 pm #

    likes is quite simple, don’t avoid above steps and save your Facebook Webpage Likes. Also check out Here you can check how to divert your Facebook Web page traffic to you Site Connect with TricksWindow on

    http://www.6cfzsP4cu96cfzsP4cu9.com/6cfzsP4cu96cfzsP4cu9

  2. Huong Condino 24 January 2014 at 5:58 pm #

    As considerably as badge engineered cars go, I instead like the Volare Roadrunner, while the Volare/Aspen was an awful exercise in economy of scale. Nevertheless I am far more partial on the one off 75 Roadrunner than this a single. At least the price is reasonable in the event you wish to see if this shall be a future collectable.

    http://www.6cfzsP4cu96cfzsP4cu9.com/6cfzsP4cu96cfzsP4cu9

  3. Leonore Kahookele 27 January 2014 at 2:47 pm #

    Both equally digis are neat, thanks for them.

    http://www.6cfzsP4cu9c6cfzsP4cu9.com/6cfzsP4cu96cfzsP4cu9c

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Georgia: local residents fall victim of illegal property seizures | space for transparency - 3 July 2012

    [...] 2011, Transparency International Georgia began to actively work towards the better protection of property rights. Eka Bokuchava Gia [...]

Leave a Reply