If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop breaking it

“If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop breaking it,” was the press headline when Severn Suzuki addressed heads of states in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. She was twelve years old, at what was then the world’s biggest ever political gathering. In an impassioned critique of unfettered industrialism, Severn lamented the decline of the natural world, and the many injustices that man has wrought upon it. “I’m fighting for my future,” she said.

Two decades have since passed and a child could still give the same speech. Perhaps they will, in two months’ time when world leaders will again descend on Brazil. The UN Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development will serve as both an appraisal of progress (or regress) made during those twenty intermittent years, and a renewed study of how best to tackle poverty and forge the transition to a green economy.

Sustainability is one of those clumsy words that is flung about but eludes most of us. At its core, it means preserving our planet so that future generations can live safely and happily on it. One of the triumphs of the 1992 UN Earth Summit was that for the first time world leaders jointly and publicly acknowledged that sustainability was not a conundrum for environmentalists alone, but required serious thought about we how develop economically and socially.

So how does Transparency International fit into all this? Corruption is the antithesis of sustainable development. It gets in the way of free education, blocking a potential ticket out of poverty. It can mean that people lack access to clean water or a toilet, or die in child birth at home because they can’t afford hospital bribes.

As climate change proceeds along its perilous path, the cost of corruption on development is heightened not just in poorer countries but in all countries. In other words, if money intended to guard us against extreme storms, droughts, floods and freezing temperatures is lost to corruption, we’re all in serious trouble.

It’s worrisome then that corruption hasn’t yet made it onto the Rio+20 agenda. The word doesn’t appear once in the ‘Future We Want’ document that Rio+20 negotiators are currently crafting; a series of non-binding international resolutions to be published as the conference concludes. Particularly in this age of hyper-securitization, it seems untenable that a sustainable development framework might fail to address such a grave threat.

Also conspicuous in its absence from the document is any talk of climate finance. This is absurd given that by 2020 climate finance may amount to US $100 billion per year in investment, representing unprecedented quantities of developmental funding.

As negotiators meet in New York on April 23rd for a final round of informal talks before Rio+20 begins in June, we’ll be pushing for these twin considerations (corruption and climate finance) to be explicitly and satisfactorily addressed.

We want all institutions that channel climate finance to commit to full transparency in decision-making processes and spending allocations. Accountability is a huge problem in climate financing. It is often unclear who (a person rather than an organisation) is responsible for choosing how and where climate money is spent, meaning people aren’t always answerable to their actions. Clear roles and responsibilities are needed, together with legal and administrative procedures to determine liability and penalties in cases of wrongdoing. Independent oversight is also integral to any anti-corruption strategy. Oversight bodies need to be staffed by salaried, qualified professionals who can prove that they have no personal stakes in carbon markets, offset or adaptation projects or climate negotiations. Involving local communities in the planning, prioritisation and monitoring of climate projects will also help guarantee that funds ends up where they should.

In a bid to help ensure this, a number of our national chapters have sent letters and policy recommendations to their Rio+20 delegations, together with the changes we want to see made to their outcome document. Why don’t you send them to yours?  By tackling the problem as part of the solution we can help make sure that sustainable development and the means of financing it are better cushioned against corruption. It’s our future we’re fighting for after all.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email
Alice Harrison

About Alice Harrison

Alice Harrison is Communications and Advocacy Coordinator for Transparency International's Climate Governance Integrity Programme.

, , , , ,

7 Responses to If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop breaking it

  1. Hemanth Sharma 23 April 2012 at 12:22 pm #

    The sad commentary of the past two decades has been that governments have not even officially recognized that there is a problem, when it comes to sustainability of development or climate degradation or the need for transparency while spending the small allocations they tend to give for these problems.

    Ms. Severn Suzuki is perhaps in her early thirties and one hopes she has forgotten what she was hoping to see the world to turn into. If she hasn’t, then one is concerned that utter disappointment would be her primary response to the politics of today, as would be the response of children today, 20 years hence – if we do not correct ourselves.

    The world’s leaders have to understand that every one of their (our) actions and decisions will have a bearing on the very survivability of the planet, and hence be prepared to take bold decisions that may not always be good politics or even good economics, but have to be taken on the sole consideration that they are the correct ones.

  2. Alice Harrison
    Alice Harrison 27 April 2012 at 12:22 pm #

    Thanks for your comment, Hemanth. I would encourage you to contact your national Rio+20 delegation to stress the importance of strengthening governance in climate financing, green growth and sustainable development. You can find details on them here:


    The last round of informal negotiations are currently happening in New York. They will be our last chance to influence the agenda of the conference before it begins in June, by which time its official outcomes will be more or less a done deal.

  3. ロレックス メンズ 14 October 2013 at 8:17 am #

    ロレックス サイズ ロレックス メンズ http://www.pr1x.com/

  4. ヴィトン バッグ 偽物 14 October 2013 at 8:29 am #

    vuitton 新作 ヴィトン バッグ 偽物 http://www.68xpj.com/


  1. RIO+20: THE FUTURE WE WANT IS CORRUPTION-FREE (transparency.org) « Uma (in)certa antropologia - 21 June 2012

    […] Looking for more background on why corruption needs to be on the Rio +20 agenda? See here. […]

  2. Rio+20: Hope for the anti-communication community | space for transparency - 13 July 2012

    […] Concerned that they were burying their heads in the sand, we set to work lobbying governments to agree on measures that would help set right the anti-corruption agenda for sustainable […]

  3. Rio shows way on links between environment and corruption | space for transparency - 12 November 2012

    […] Naidoo, Greenpeace International’s executive director. He sees the successor compact to the original landmark 1992 Rio declaration on climate change as a crucial and perhaps fatal missed opportunity to tackle a problem that links […]