Oil wealth and revolution

G20: Leading on anti-corruption? The view from civil society

Today Transparency International publishes its report on the transparency of oil and gas companies.

The report shows that the majority of companies do not reveal payments to governments in countries where the extract oil and gas.

A good example for what this means in practice is Libya: A quarter of the country’s economy come from its oil reserves, the world’s eighth largest. Only about 5% of the country’s export revenues does not come from this oil.

So the prosperity of the Libyan people depends on how oil money is spent. It is now clear that until now this wealth has been used to keep a political clique in power for generations.

World leaders have been trying to find a way to have a positive influence in the Middle East. Our report highlights one area: the role of multinational companies who extract the mineral wealth so vital to the economy.

12 oil and gas companies reviewed by Transparency International operate in Libya, but only one (Statoil) operates with major transparency. No other company publicly discloses how much money it pays the Libya government to operate there.

This picture is replicated across North Africa. Of the 22 companies in our survey operating in Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia or Libya, only 2 disclose royalty payments to governments (Statoil and Talisman). The other disclose next to nothing, sometimes production volumes, or operational reserves.

With change in the air, the question in future will be how to make sure that future oil revenues are a blessing for a growing democracy and sustainable development, not a curse.

To keep oil revenues more in the open in future, allowing citizens in resource rich countries to better hold their governments to account over the use of oil and gas revenue, we should look at the reporting rules that multinational companies adhere to.

These have to come from countries with major financial centres.

In 2010 the US passed a law that would oblige oil and gas companies listed on its stock exchange to disclose payments to governments in every country they operate in. Other governments, stock exchanges and international accounting bodies should do the same.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email

, , , , , , ,

3 Responses to Oil wealth and revolution

  1. Carl Dolan
    Carl Dolan 1 March 2011 at 6:54 pm #

    When it came to disclosing information on a country-by-country basis, EU companies scored less than North Americans and Australians. Their average score was level with Lukoil of Russia, four times less than Statoil of Norway. What explains this apparent accountability gap? Perhaps it is because the recent legislative changes in the US and Hong Kong have forced companies registered here to adapt their behaviour, whereas the EU institutions have been dragging their feet on similar legislation. The relevant piece of legislation – the 2004 Transparency Directive -has been reviewed and proposals for its modification will be put forward soon. Both Nicolas Sarkozy and George Osbourne have voiced their support for EU-wide rules on country-by-country reporting, but there are indications that the European Commission will look to delay any proposals until later this year. If the EU does not act, the US-German stock exchange merger (NYSE-Euronext with Deutsche Börse) may end up introducing the stricter US requirements in Europe anyway.
    Does the EU want to see its much vaunted Single Market adapting standards, when it used to be setting them?


  1. Securing sustainable development outcomes through good governance and transparency | space for transparency - 27 September 2012

    […] of the countries in which they operate. This increased transparency will help to reverse the “resource curse”, which has become shorthand for the corruption, conflict and poverty that is too often […]

  2. Corruption in the world today | Angus West - 7 April 2014

    […] which are being tapped. An abundance of natural resources in poor countries often leads to high levels of corruption. Where land is used for agriculture and is necessary “for feeding the nation,” […]