A bribery scheme to win market dominance in Mexico?

Over the weekend, the New York Times alleged that Wal-Mart deliberately hid investigations into bribery practices at the company’s largest foreign subsidiary, Wal-Mart de Mexico. Wal-Mart is Mexico’s largest private sector employer with currently 209,000 employees. Allegedly there is a paper trail that includes hundreds of suspect payments worth more 24 million USD in total.

The allegations go back to 2005, when a former Wal-Mart de Mexico executive described in an email to one of Wal-Mart’s senior lawyers how the company operated a bribery scheme in order to secure construction permits in virtually every corner of the country. Still, according to the New York Times story, the executives at Wal-Mart headquarters were more interested in damage control than amending the situation in ethical and legal terms. Supposedly, the story said, Wal-Mart shut down its internal investigation despite a report stating that both Mexican and U.S. laws were likely violated, in order to accelerate the company’s rapid expansion in the country.

Eduardo Bohorquez, Executive Director of Transparencia Mexicana, Transparency International’s National Chapter in Mexico, calls for the Mexican government to probe Wal-Mart as international conventions obligate the country’s government to get involved although only local officials have been mentioned in the allegations. “The laws in Mexico and the United States relating to bribery are in effect, so the practices (of legal business) should be the same in both countries,” he said in an interview with the Associated Press yesterday.

Wal-Mart would not be the first US company to be investigated for illicit payments in Mexico. Only last month Mexican authorities revealed that a US aviation company was under scrutiny for bribery allegations.

Yet, a recent TI report shows that there is little or no enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention in Mexico. Among others, there is inadequate whistleblower protection as well as inadequate criminal and corporate laws to hold parent companies responsible for bribery in foreign countries by subsidiaries.

In Transparency International’s 2011 Bribe Payers Index which ranks the likelihood of companies from leading economies to win business abroad by paying bribes, the US scores 8.1 and Mexico 7.0. These figures show that foreign bribery is still an issue to tackle in both countries. Only China and Russia ranked behind Mexico. Also public sector corruption is perceived to be rampant in Mexico. The country scores 3 and ranked 100 out of 183 countries in the 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index.

According to Transparencia Mexicana, corruption is on the rise in Mexico. The 2010 National Index of Corruption and Good Governance released in May 2011 shows that households paid bribes in over 10 per cent of cases when accessing a range of public procedures or services. In 2010, the estimated costs of this form of corruption exceeded 32 billion pesos (approximately 2.5 billion USD). This represented an additional ‘tax’ of more than 14 per cent of an average Mexican household’s income.

Sadly, as Eduardo Bohorquez says, this figure jumps even more when big corporations try to operate in Mexico’s highly federalised states, each of which has its own set of rules on how to set up a business or lease property. Now is the time for both Mexican and US officials to step up.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email
Natalie Baharav

About Natalie Baharav

Natalie Baharav is Communications Officer at Transparency International.

, , , , , ,

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. A bribery scheme to win market dominance in Mexico? « Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development - 23 April 2012

    [...] & Economic Development. Cross posted with permission from Transparency International’s Space for Transparency blog. By Natalie Baharavflickr / karathepirateOver the weekend, the New York Times alleged that [...]

  2. Cobus de Swardt: Practicing What You Preach: A Lesson for Walmart’s Bosses - DigaNews | DigaNews - 26 April 2012

    [...] may not have adequately monitored the effectiveness of its anticorruption policy. According to the reports in the New York Times it took an ex-employee who had left the company to step forward. We can [...]

  3. Practicing What You Preach: A Lesson for Walmart’s Bosses | Economy In Crisis - 26 April 2012

    [...] may not have adequately monitored the effectiveness of its anticorruption policy. According to the reports in the New York Times it took an ex-employee who had left the company to step forward. We can [...]

  4. The Obstacle in Journalism | 2goface - 1 July 2013

    [...] investigations by the New York Times revealed Wal-Mart de Mexico’s alleged bribery campaign to win market dominance in Mexico. Among the report’s discoveries is an alleged paper trail that includes hundreds of [...]

  5. The Dodd-Frank Act and FCPA Whistleblowers - Berger Montague Blog - Filing a Qui Tam Action with the SEC - 4 July 2013

    [...] FCPA anti-bribery violations apply to all persons or entities that fall under SEC guidelines. The FCPA makes it very clear that the federal government does not condone nor tolerate bribery. It goes on to say that bribery is not a normal “cost of doing business” abroad, nor is it an acceptable way to gain an edge on competitors in foreign markets. [...]