Keeping their word: a look at politicians running on anti-corruption platforms

The international community is far less tolerant of corruption than it was only 20 years ago. There is a growing outrage from civil society and research has increasingly demonstrated the negative effects of corruption on political stability, economic growth and poverty alleviation. One could say that anti-corruption is “hip”.

This trend is also reflected in national politics.

Politicians trying to win favour with their constituents flout the anti-corruption message as an important platform to run with what resonates with the electorate.

Campaign pledges to “put an end to corruption”, to “wipe out corruption” or to “make corruption history” have become widespread as politicians have understood that integrity is a priority for voters. But in many cases, these pledges and campaign trail promises remain just that. Here are some examples of unfulfilled anti-corruption pledges:

  • In early 2008 during the Russian presidential elections, candidate Dmitry Medvedev put corruption forward as an important issue for the country and prepared a National Anti-Corruption Plan – including the promise to adopt an anti-corruption law to clarify the procedures for appointing judges and to develop mechanisms to prevent conflicts of interest. Medvedev’s administration ticked major boxes in its anti-corruption agenda, but substantial changes are yet to be seen due to the lack of political will in enforcing these laws and mechanisms. Experts say that neither Vladimir Putin nor Medvedev proved that they were taking the fight against corruption seriously as the reforms created little real change for ordinary citizens. Read more about Russia’s anti-corruption predicament here.

    Street scene Bangladesh

    A street scene at the time of Bangladesh’s 2008 elections. Many anti-corruption promises were made by politicians, but their implementation has been inconsistent.

  • In 2007, candidate Nicolas Sarkozy signed Transparency International France’s anti-corruption pledge, committing to enhancing the protection of whistleblowers, to include the topic of corruption in civic education curricula, to promote the anti-money laundering agenda, to broaden and strengthen asset declarations and reinforce the judiciary and political finance watchdogs. During his presidential mandate, Sarkozy took a few steps forward in the fight against corruption, but did not tackle the most serious corruption risks of the country – namely the lack of an independent judiciary, the weakness of political finance watchdogs and the collusion between the economic and political elites. Read Transparency International France’s analysis here.
  • The 2009 elections put the fight against corruption high on the agenda of Bangladeshi politicians. The ruling alliance, namely the Bangladesh Awami League, made “taking effective actions against corruption” one of its five electoral pledges. The party’s manifesto promised to take measures to eliminate bribery and extortion, and to curtail leaders’ abuse of power. The government has since passed a number of laws, but their implementation is inconsistent. In addition, a set of amendments was introduced – but not adopted, thanks to civil society’s outrage – to weaken the Anti-Corruption Commission. Patronage networks and political interference remain a major problem in Bangladeshi politics.

But here is the good news: citizens can play a role in holding their leaders accountable for campaign pledges and a number of tools and approaches have already been developed to help them do so. These are only a few examples of such initiatives:

The Polish NGO Mam Prawo Wiedziec (“I have a right to know”) has developed an app to crowd-source the collection of promises ahead of the local elections that will take place in 2014. To prevent candidates from making empty promises during their campaign trails, Mam Prawo Wiedziec encourages citizens to capture electoral promises on the go through photos of posters and recordings of speeches. The aim is to contribute to the NGO’s wider objective of collecting and organising candidates’ promises on its web platform.

In France, the newspaper Le Monde together with Lui President, a website created by three journalism students, uses data visualisation to track whether the government has kept its anti-corruption promises.

The Cambodian Committee for Free and Fair Elections (COMFREL) works to increase the accountability of elected officials by monitoring their performance and the fulfilment of campaign pledges using voter scorecards.

What other initiatives have you come across in your part of the world? Share your examples in the comments box below!

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email
Sofia Wickberg

About Sofia Wickberg

Sofia Wickberg was previously Knowledge and Policy Officer for Transparency International's Anti-Corruption Helpdesk and is now a PhD student.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to Keeping their word: a look at politicians running on anti-corruption platforms

  1. rudolf 10 October 2013 at 8:22 am #

    I´m confrontated with finance police department in Holland , who was trying, on requests of goverment people in New Zealand, to keep an 15 million USD laundering scam , under the carpet

    Thanks god so far, judges in Holland are not corrupt.

    As victim of such a scam, the dutch company has been made empty, the help I get is terrible.

  2. Helen Pender 26 October 2013 at 8:54 pm #

    Rutland County Council employed Solicitors Bevan Brittan to sue 3 RCC councillors for defamation. Why? The three had called their group “Rutland Antiques-corruption Group”. On 10 January 2013 Keith Peter Lucas of Bevan Brittan presented a report to the council advising them they could sue Cllrs Richardson, Wainwright and Gale since the name of their group cast a slur on their fellow councillors. As an apology was demanded from the 3 councillors in the council chamber police were circling around the ce car park ready to arrest them once they’d apologised. Then Inspector Mistry and RD McDonald wrote to the 3 councillors threatening them – letter available to view on 4Rutland websitebsite. If they didn’t stop asking questions they were warnedthey could be arrested for harassment of RCC’s CEO. They were concerned about the suicide of an officer of RCC- Aman Mehra – reported to Private Eye by his family of “Discovering things he shouldn’t have.” We still haven’t had the questions addressed and the CEO, Helen Briggs, says “The organisation is trying to move forward.” The police investigation seems to have focused on protecting RCC and Mrs Briggs. Indeed the police sat idly by whilst a blatant attempt was made to fix the election in 2011 to prevent Cllr Richardson winning his seat.Contact me on 07932943902.

  3. Helen Pender 26 October 2013 at 8:57 pm #

    Amendment predictive texts error: Rutland Anti-Corruption Group. Nothing to do with antiques

  4. Sienna Pratt 10 December 2013 at 1:09 pm #

    Thanks for all the details. The online platform is designed to ensure a high degree of user input and interaction. Registered users of ACRN can comment on posted items and they are able to create their own user profiles and connect with other corruption experts across the globe. They can subscribe to targeted information streams from the web platform using RSS. The forums can be used by members to seek peer advice, brainstorm new ideas and the Calendar and the Marketplace can be used to share information on upcoming conferences, funding opportunities or jobs. political corruption

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Corruption Perceptions Index 2013: Time for Action - 3 December 2013

    […] is an increasingly attractive platform for politicians, with many incorporating anti-corruption pledges into their election campaigns. It reflects waning […]

  2. La corrupción hoy en el mundo | Loiola XXI - 5 December 2013

    […] is an increasingly attractive platform for politicians, with many incorporating anti-corruption pledges into their election campaigns. It reflects waning […]

  3. Corruption Perceptions Index 2013: Interesting article of Transparency International | A Feilen Detective Privado TIP 1.056 www.afeilendetectiv.es - 6 February 2014

    […] is an increasingly attractive platform for politicians, with many incorporating anti-corruption pledges into their election campaigns. It reflects waning […]