Bribery is bad for business

We ask businesspeople where they lose out to competitors’ corruption.

One of the biggest corruption stories in the world this year was the allegation that Walmart paid bribes totalling US$24 million in its Mexican operations. It makes you wonder how many other companies lost out because of those bribes.

A new survey gives us some idea. Almost one in two businesspeople surveyed in Mexico (48 per cent) think they have lost business because of bribery.

In 2011, Transparency International carried out a survey of businesspeople in 30 countries worldwide. These countries are from every continent, each with different levels of income and private sector development. We asked between 82 and 114 businesspeople from each of these countries for their views of corruption and anti-corruption. For more details on the businesspeople and company sizes surveyed in each country, please take a look here.

The results found that 27 per cent, or more than one in four businesspeople surveyed, think that they had lost business in the last 12 months due to bribery.

Clearly, for many businesses around the world, bribery and corruption present a very real cost.

Bribery can take different forms in different contexts

Companies bribe to win contracts, speed up bureaucracy and avoid the rules – or change them. They do not just do this by passing a brown envelope (see here the more sophisticated means of passing envelopes), but also through more indirect financial contributions that are intended to influence procurement processes and policy makers.

Looking at the results for each of the countries surveyed, we must also consider how the perspectives of the businesspeople surveyed can vary. The sample of businesspeople surveyed varies across the 30 countries in terms of the sector they operate in, their size, international exposure and so on.

We must explore these results with an appreciation for the varying contexts and perceptions of the respondents. Respondents have access to different levels of information about the way public contracts are given out. They work in environments where the level of media activity exposing corruption cases can vary.

The results of this question shine an important light on perceptions of bribes paid by companies. But for a fuller picture of corruption in these 30 countries, we need to complement this data with other corruption measurements:

These scores do show us, however, that this impact of bribery in the private sector can be felt anywhere. The extent to which bribery, as opposed to merit, is used to determine who gets a deal, is worrying not just for businesses (and investors), but to all of us that are interested in achieving the most efficient and just outcome for our economies and societies.

Any company that wants to do business globally should be glad that more governments are prosecuting companies for bribery, as a new Transparency International report shows today.

By country: Businesspeople who think they failed to win a contract or gain new business in the past 12 months because a competitor paid a bribe.

Country 
Argentina     17%
Austria     20%
Brazil     34%
Chile     23%
China     27%
Czech Republic     37%
Egypt     41%
France     29%
Germany     20%
Ghana     23%
Hong Kong     10%
Hungary     20%
India     36%
Indonesia     47%
Japan     2%
Malaysia     50%
Mexico     48%
Morocco     31%
Nigeria     24%
Pakistan     42%
Philippines     19%
Poland     32%
Russia     39%
Senegal     28%
Singapore     9%
South Africa     34%
South Korea     11%
Turkey     18%
United Kingdom     17%
USA     30%

Update: More data now available in our interactive tool

You can see the full results on 10 September, when we will be making the answers to these questions available online in a new interactive website, which will allow you to compare the data across countries, sectors, gender of respondent and more.

The results also varied across sector. More businesspeople in the telecoms sector believed that they had lost business due to bribery, than in the agriculture sector, for example.

And this is just one of the questions we asked the businesspeople. We will publish some of the other findings throughout September.

Have a look at the data and tell us what you think.

Share and enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • YahooBuzz
  • Print
  • email
Deborah Hardoon

About Deborah Hardoon

Deborah Hardoon is Senior Research Coordinator at Transparency International.

, , , , , ,

8 Responses to Bribery is bad for business

  1. Ekonomist 11 September 2012 at 1:37 am #

    well An economist telling from Turkey! i just want to say this rate for our country is much more than.

  2. больницы 26 September 2012 at 11:42 am #

    Hi, i feel that i noticed you visited my blog so i got here to go back the prefer?.I am trying to in finding things to enhance my site!I guess its adequate to use some of your ideas!!

  3. science 2012 6 November 2012 at 9:56 pm #

    My brother recommended I would possibly like this blog. He was entirely right. This put up actually made my day. You can not believe simply how a lot time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Rise in Prosecutions Makes It Harder to Get Away with Foreign Bribery « Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development - 6 September 2012

    [...] to their business in the last 12 months, according to a Transparency International survey also published today.“It is vital that the climate of economic crisis does not tempt governments to seek to cut [...]

  2. UK Bribery: Unfinished business « Anti Corruption Focus - 17 September 2012

    [...] data from Transparency International’s 2011 Bribe Payer’s Survey has been released , providing further insight into corruption in UK business. The data supplements that collected [...]

  3. PUTTING CORRUPTION OUT OF BUSINESS « Frontier Markets Compendium - 21 September 2012

    [...] a blog post announcing the release of the results, Transparency International Research Manager Deborah Hardoon [...]

  4. Is the G20 serious about fighting corruption? | space for transparency - 12 December 2012

    [...] enforcement challenge can be found in the area of combating bribery in international business. G20 members China,India,Indonesia and Saudi Arabia have not yet ratified the OECD anti-bribery [...]

  5. MNCs behaving badly | The Moving Hand Writes - 24 December 2012

    [...] Transparency International maintains the Corruption Perceptions Index which “scores and ranks countries based on perceptions of corruption in the public sector.” In 2011, they surveyed 3,016 business executives in 30 countries about bribery. In Malaysia, 50 percent of businesspeople reported that they lost business due to bribes paid by competitors. Mexico was second-worst. See graphic below (Source: TI). [...]